Reflexiones sobre la frontera. Una búsqueda de esquemas de investigación alternativos

Reflecting on the Border. A Search for Alternative Research Approaches

Roberto Sanchez Rodriguez

Idioma original

Resumen

En este trabajo se retoma las contribuciones recientes de los estudios a nivel internacional sobre las fronteras para explorar esquemas de investigación de la frontera entre México y Estados Unidos. A pesar de los avances en la construcción de conocimiento sobre esa región durante las últimas décadas, los esquemas de investigación continúan basados en enfoques disciplinares orientados a documentar y explicar procesos específicos, con lo cual se fragmenta el conocimiento sobre la compleja y dinámica realidad de esa frontera. El trabajo considera la interdisciplina y la transdisciplina como enfoques útiles para teorizar sobre las fronteras.

Palabras clave: teorizar; interdisciplina; fronteras internacionales; desarrollo; frontera México-Estados Unidos


Abstract

This article departs from recent contributions in the study of international borders in order to build a better understanding of the US-Mexico border. Despite advances in building better knowledge of this region in recent decades, research continues to be predominantly based on fragmented disciplinary approaches. This paper considers interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches to support theorizing on the border region. Building these approaches face a number of problems but it is a much-needed effort to update and improve our knowledge of the complex border realities.

Keywords: theorizing, interdisciplinarity, international borders, development, US-Mexico border


Texto completo:

Idioma original


Referencias

AGNEW, John, 2000, “From the Political Economy of Regions to Regional Political Economy”, Progress in Human Geography, SAGE Publications, vol. 24, núm. 1, pp. 101-110.

AGNEW, John, 2005, “Sovereignty Regimes: Territoriality and State Authority in Contemporary World Politics”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Washington, D. C., Routledge, vol. 95, núm. 2, pp. 437-461.

ALLEN, John y Allan COCHRANE, 2007, “Beyond the Territorial Fix: Regional Assemblages, Politics and Power”, Regional Studies, Seaford, Susexx del Este, Taylor & Francis, vol. 41, núm. 9, pp. 1161-1175.

AMIN, Ash, 2004, “Regions Unbound: Towards a new Politics of Place”, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, Suecia, Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography, vol. 86, núm. 1, pp. 33-44.

BALSIGER, Philip W., 2004, “Supradisciplinary Research Practices: History, Objectives and Rationale”, Futures, Elsevier, vol. 36, pp. 407-421.

BAKHTIN, Mikhail, 1981, The Dialogic Imagination, Austin, University of Texas Press.

BAMMER, Gabriele, 2005, “Integration and Implementation Sciences: Building a new Specialization”, Ecology and Society, The Resilience Alliance, vol. 10, núm. 2, art. 6, en .

BAZERMAN, Charles, 2010, “Scientific Knowledge, Public Knowledge, and Public Policy: Genred Formation and Disruption of Knowledge for Acting about Global Warming”, Linguagem em (Dis)curso, Brasil, Universidad del Sur de Santa Catarina, vol. 10, núm. 3, pp. 445-463.

BLATTER, Joachin, 2003, “Beyond Hierarchies and Networks: Institutional Logics and Change in Transboundary Spaces”, Governance, Montreal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16, núm. 4, pp. 503-526.

BRUNET-JAILLY, Emmanuel, 2005, “Theorizing Borders: An Interdisciplinary Perspective”, Geopolitics, Washington, D. C., Routledge, vol. 10, núm. 4, pp. 633-649.

BUANES, Arild y Svein JENTOFT, 2009, “Building Bridges: Institutional Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity”, Futures, Elsevier, vol. 41, pp. 446-454.

BUSTAMANTE, Jorge, 1989, “Frontera México-Estados Unidos: Reflexiones para un marco teórico”, Frontera Norte, Tijuana, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, vol. 1, núm. 1, pp. 7-24.

CASTÁN BROTO, Vanesa; Maya GISLASON y Melf-Hinrich EHLERS, 2009, “Practising Interdisciplinarity in the Interplay between Disciplines: Experiences of Established Researchers, Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12, núm. 7, pp. 922-933.

CASTELLS, Manuel,1996, The rise of Network Society, Oxford, Blackwell.

COX, Kevin R., 1998, “Spaces of Dependence, Spaces of Engagement and the Politics of Scale, or: Looking for Local Politics”, Political Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17, núm. 1, pp. 1-23.

ELDEN, Stuart, 2005, “Missing the Point: Globalization, Deterritorialization and the Space of the World”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Londres, Wiley-Blackwell, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 8-19.

FRY, Gary, 2001, “Multifunctional Landscapes–Towards Transdisciplinary Research”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Elsevier, vol. 57, núms. 3-4, pp. 159-168.

GIDDENS, Anthony, 1984, The Constitution of Society, Cambridge, Polity Press.

JAHN, Thomas; Mathias BERGMANN y Florian KEIL, 2012, “Transdiscplinarity: Between Mainstreaming and Marginalization”, Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79, pp. 1-10.

JESSOP, Bob; Neil BRENNER y Martin JONES, Martin, 2008, “Theorizing Spatial Relations”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Londres, Pion Ltd., vol. 26, pp. 389-401.

JOHNSON, Corey et al., 2011, “Interventions on Rethinking ‘the Border’ in Border Studies”, Political Geography, Elsevier, vol. 30, núm. 2, pp. 61-69.

JONES, Martin, 2009, “Phase Space: Geography, Relational Thinking, and Beyond”, Progress in Human Geography, SAGE Publications, vol. 33, núm. 4, pp. 487-506.

JONES, Martin y Bob JESSOP, 2010, “Thinking State/Space Incompossibly”, Antipode, Reino Unido, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42, núm. 5, pp. 1119-1149.

HAUGAARD, Mark y Henri GOVERDE, 2009, “Editorial. Power and Space”, Journal of Power, Routledge, vol. 2, núm. 2, pp. 191-195.

KOLOSSOV, Vladimir, 2005, “Border Studies: Changing Perspectives and Theoretical Approaches”, Geopolitics, Washington, D. C., Routledge, vol. 10, núm. 5, pp. 606-632.

KUINDERSMA, Wiebren; Ben ARTS y Martin VAN DER ZOUWEN, 2012, “Power Faces in Regional Governance”, Journal of Political Power, Routledge, vol. 5, núm. 3, pp. 411-429.

LEFEBVRE, Henri, 1991, The Production of Space, Oxford, Blackwell.

MACLEOD, Gordon y Martin JONES, 2007, “Territorial, Scalar, Networked, Connected: In what Sense a ‘Regional World’?”, Regional Studies, Routledge, vol. 41, núm 9, pp. 1-15.

MANN, Michael, 1986, The Source of Social Power. Volume 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to A. D. 1760, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

MARRIFIELD, Andy, 2006, Henri Lefrebvre: A Critical Introduction, New York, Routledge.

MAX-NEEF, Manfred, 2005, “Foundations of Transdisciplinarity”, Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53, núm. 1, pp. 5-16.

MAYER, Margit, 2008, “To what End do we Theorize Sociospatial Relations?”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Londres, Pion Ltd., vol. 26, núm. 3, pp. 414-419.

MINGHI, Julian, 1963, “Boundary Studies in Political Geography”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Washington, D. C., Routledge, vol. 53, núm. 3, pp. 407-428.

NAESS, Lars Otto et al., 2006, “Data and Processes Linking Vulnerability Assessment to Adaptation Decision-Making on Climate Change in Norway”, Global Environmental Change, Elsevier, vol. 16, núm. 2, pp. 221-233.

NEWMAN, David, 2006, “The Lines that Continue to Separate Us: Borders in Our Borderless’ World”, Progress in Human Geography, SAGE Publications, vol. 30, núm. 2, pp. 143-161.

NICOL, Heather y Julian MINGHI, 2005, “The Continuing Relevance of Borders in Contemporary Contexts”, Geopolitics, Washington, D. C., Routledge, vol. 10, pp. 680-687.

O’DOWD, Liam, 2010, “From a ‘Borderless World’ to a ‘World of Borders’: Bringing History Back In”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space Londres, Pion Ltd., vol. 28, pp. 1031-1050.

OHMAE, Kenichi, 1995, The end of the nation-state, New York, Free Press.

OLMEDO, Carlos y Denisse SODEN, 2005, “Terrorism’s Role in Re-shaping Border Crossings: 11 September and the US Borders”, Geopolitics, Washington, D. C., Routledge, vol. 10, pp. 741-766.

OJEDA, Mario, 1981, “México y los Estados Unidos: ¿Interdependencia o Dependencia de México?”, en Roque GONZÁLEZ SALAZAR, editor, La frontera del norte. Integración y desarrollo, México, El Colegio de México.

PAINTER, Joe, 2010, “Rethinking Territory”, Antipode, Reino Unido, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42, núm. 5, pp. 1020-1118.

PARKET, Noel et al., 2009, “Lines in the Sand? Towards an Agenda of Critical Border Studies”, Geopolitics, Washington, D. C., Routledge, vol. 14, núm. 3, pp. 582-587.

PAASI, Anssi, 1996, Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian border, Chichester, Wiley.

PAASI, Anssi, 2003, “Region and Place: Regional Identity in Question”, Progress in Human Geography, SAGE Publications, vol. 27, núm. 4, pp. 475-485.

PASSI, Anssi, 2005, “Generations and the ‘Development’ of Border Studies”, Geopolitics, Washington, D. C., Routledge, vol. 10, núm. 4, pp. 663-671.

PAASI, Anssi, 2009, “Bounded Spaces in a ‘Borderless World’: Border Studies, Power and Anatomy of Territory, Journal of Power, Routledge, vol. 2, núm. 2, pp. 213-234.

PAASI, Anssi, 2011, “Border, Theory and the Challenge of Relational Thinking”, en Corey JOHNSON et al., “Interventions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies”, Political Geography, Elsevier, vol. 30, núm. 2, pp. 61-69.

PETTS, Judith; Susan OWENS y Harriet BULKELEY, 2008, “Crossing Boundaries: Interdisciplinarity in the Context of Urban Environments”, Geoforum, Elsevier, vol. 39, pp. 593-601.

PODESTA, Guillermo et al., 2013, “Interdisciplinary Production of Knowledge with Participation of Stakeholders: A Case Study of a Collaborative Project on Climate Variability, Human Decisions and Agricultural Ecosystems in the Argentine Pampas”, Environmental Science and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26, pp. 40-48.

POHL, Christian, 2005, “Transdisciplinary Collaboration in Environmental Research”, Futures, Elsevier, vol. 37, pp. 1159-1178.

PURCELL, Mark y Joseph NEVINS, 2005, “Pushing the Boundary: State Restructuring, State Theory, and the Case of the U.S.-Mexico Border Enforcement in the 1990s”, Political Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24, pp. 211-235.

PRESCOTTS, John, 1987, Political Frontiers and Boundaries, Londres, Unwin Hyman.

ROBERTSON, David y Bruce HULL, 2003, “Public Ecology: An Environmental Science and Policy for Global Society”, Environmental Science and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6, pp. 399-410.

ROUX, Dirk et al., 2006, “Bridging the Science-Management Divide: Moving from Unidirectional Knowledge Transfer to Knowledge Interfacing and Sharing”, Ecology and Society, The Resilience Alliance, vol. 11, núm. 1, art. 4, disponible en .

SÁNCHEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, Roberto, 2006, “La dimensión social y ambiental de la maquiladora en México. En búsqueda de un marco de desarrollo”, en Kevin MIDDELBROOK y Eduardo ZEPEDA, editores, La industria maquiladora en México, México, D. F., Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

SAYER, Andrew, 1992, Method in Social Science: A Realistic Approach, Londres, Routledge.

SUNDBERG, Juanita, 2011, “Diabolic Caminos in the Desert and Cat Fights

in the Rio: A Posthumanist Political Ecology of Boundary Enforcement in the United States-Mexico Borderlands”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Washington, D. C., Routledge, vol. 101, núm. 2, pp. 318-336.

STRANGE, Susan, 1996, The Retreat of the State, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

TURNHOUT, Esther; Matthijs HISSCHEMÖLLER y Herman EIJSACKERS, 2007, “Ecological Indicators: Between the two Fires of Science and Policy”, Ecological Indicators, Elsevier, vol. 7, núm. 2, pp. 215-228.

VAN HOUTUM, Henk, 2005, “The Geopolitics of Borders and Boundaries”, Geopolitics, Routledge, vol. 10, núm. 4, pp. 672-675.

ZANDVOORT, Henk, 1995, “Concepts of Interdiscplinarity and Environmental Science”, en Theo KUIPERS y Anne MACKOR, editores, Cognitive Patterns in Science and Common Sense. Groningen Studies in Philosophy of Science, Logic, and Epistemology, Atlanta, Georgia, Rodopi, pp. 45-68.

ZIMMERBAUER, Kaj; Timo SUUTARI y Antti SAARTENOJA, 2012, “Resistance to the Deinstitutionalization of a Region: Borders, Identity and Activism in a Municipality Merger”, Geoforum, Elsevier, vol. 43, núm 6, pp. 1065-1075.





Copyright (c) 2017 Frontera Norte

Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
EL COLEGIO DE LA FRONTERA NORTE
Todos los contenidos publicados en esta revista se encuentran bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Licencia de Creative Commons