Women at Work: An Analysis of Current Times in the United States
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
Authors publishing work in this journal agree to the following conditions:
Authors retain copyright and assign first publication rights to the journal Frontera Norte (RFN), with the texts registered under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to use published material provided they give credit to the authors and acknowledge this journal as the first publisher.
They authorize the reproduction, publication, translation, communication, and transmission of their paper and all accompanying material, publicly and in any form and by any means; its public distribution in as many copies as required; and public communication thereof in any form, including making it available to the public through electronic means or any other technology, and solely for dissemination and scientific, cultural, and non-commercial purposes.
Authors may enter into further independent contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for instance, to include it in an institutional repository or personal webpage, or publish it in a book), provided it is not for commercial purposes and they clearly state that the work was first published in Frontera Norte (RFN) [and add the corresponding bibliographical record: Author/s (Year). Title of paper. Frontera Norte, volume (number), pp. doi: xxxx].
To that end, authors must submit the form assigning ownership of first publication rights, duly completed and signed. This document is to be uploaded in PDF format as a complementary file on the OJS platform.
This work is released under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)..
References
Martha C. Howell, Women, Production and Patriarchy in Late Medieval Cities(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986, p. 19).
Gerth and Mills' interpretation of this sociological construction is that "Weber's interest in world-wide comparisons led him to consider extreme and 'pure cases.' These cases became 'crucial instances' and controlled the level of abstraction that he used in connection with any particular problem. The real meat of history would usually fall in between such extreme types; hence Weber would approximate the multiplicity of specific historical situations by bringing various type concepts to bear upon the specific case under his focus." H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills, From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1958, pp. 59-60).
Howard V. Hayghe, "Are Women Leaving the Labor Force?", Monthly Labor Review, July 1994, pp. 37-39.
It should also be pointed out that men's labor force participation rates have declined since the 1950s--although interestingly this decline seems to have bottomed-out during the second half of the 1980s. See Juliet B. Schor, The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure (New York: Basic Books, 1991)
William Goodman, "Women and Jobs in Recoveries: 1970-1993". Monthly Labor Review, July 1994: 28-36.
Goodman, p. 35.
This in contrast to the widely held view that capital merely seeks the cheapest labor that it can find. In reality, firms seek low labor costs, but they must balance this against other variables, such as skill levels, factory socialization, transportation and production infraestructure, location relative to markets and resources, and availability of suppliers and subcontractors.
Paul Ryscavage, "Gender-related Shifts in the Distribution of Wages", Monthly Labor Review, July 1994, pp. 3-15.
Wage categories are as follows (yearly earnings in 1992 dollars); low--less than $12 000; low-to-middle--$12 000 to $23 999; middle--$24 000 to $47 999; middle-to-high--$48 000 to 59 999; and high$60 000 or more.
All data utilized in this section of the analysis are to be found in Theresa J. Devine, "Characteristics of Self-employed Women in the United States," Monthly Labor Review, March 1994.
Many women preferred working under the new factory system, since they disliked domestic work and farm work was much too hard. Employers, on the other hand, preferred this new labor force because its rural origins meant it would accept low wages and that it lacked a labor rights ideology, such that: "...the new corporations looked to obtain workers not paying sufficient wages to draw males away from their occupations (form which they might also bring ideas about workers' prerequisites and rights), but to attract a less skilled workforce of rural female labor. Domestic service, the only widely available alternative employment paying wages, was repugnant to many women because of its subservient nature. Farm life had taught them how to work hard and not fear hard work. If they could be attracted, they could do the work." Laurence F. Gross, The Course of Industrial Decline. The Boott Cotton Mills of Lowell, Massachusetts, 1835-1955. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993, p. 9.
All data which appears in this analysis are reported in Howard V. Hayghe and Suzanne M. Bianchi, "Married Mothers' Work Patterns: The Job-Family Compromise," Monthly Labor Review, June 1994.
All data appearing in this section of the analysis appear in William G. Deming, "Work at Home: Data from the CPS," Monthly Labor Review, February 1994.
There are a number of difficulties with the identification of these occupations, since the definition of what "childcare" means may be left to the interpretation of the census taker or of the respondent. In any case, it would appear that both of these occupations do not require a great deal of specialization although they may be technical in nature.