Local Perceptions of Hydrocarbon Exploitation Operations in the Northeastern Region of Mexico

Article Sidebar

PDF XML (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España))
Published: Aug 9, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17428/rfn.v30i60.1139
Keywords:
hydrocarbons public perceptions information Mexico Burgos Basin

Main Article Content

Dionicio MORALES RAMÍREZ
Facultad de Ingeniería "Arturo Narro Siller" de la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
Elias ALVARADO LAGUNAS
Profesor e investigador de la Facultad de Contaduría Pública y Administración, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.
Esteban PICAZZO PALENCIA
Profesor e investigador del Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Ricardo TOBÍAS JARAMILLO
Profesor e investigador, Facultad de Ingeniería en la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas

Abstract

This work studies the perceptions of the inhabitants of the Burgos Basin about the exploitation of hydrocarbons in that region in Mexico’s northeast. It uses a sample of 1 549 people and a logistic regression model for the analysis. The results show that 90.7 percent of the people who perceive an effect associate it with something negative. The findings also show that access to means of communication, and information about the issue, have an effect on the formation of perceptions. Because of insecurity in the localities, the survey was not carried out in a random and systematic way. Still, this study, utilizing a little-used approach in Mexico, shows the perceptions, and the driving factors behind them, that inhabitants have about the extractive operations that take place in the region.

Article Details

How to Cite
MORALES RAMÍREZ, D., ALVARADO LAGUNAS, E., PICAZZO PALENCIA, E., & TOBÍAS JARAMILLO, R. (2018). <strong>Local Perceptions of Hydrocarbon Exploitation Operations in the Northeastern Region of Mexico</strong>. Frontera Norte, 30(60), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.17428/rfn.v30i60.1139
Issue
Vol. 30 No. 60 (2018): julio-diciembre, 2018
Section
Papers
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors publishing work in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. Authors retain copyright and assign first publication rights to the journal Frontera Norte (RFN), with the texts registered under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to use published material provided they give credit to the authors and acknowledge this journal as the first publisher.

  2. They authorize the reproduction, publication, translation, communication, and transmission of their paper and all accompanying material, publicly and in any form and by any means; its public distribution in as many copies as required; and public communication thereof in any form, including making it available to the public through electronic means or any other technology, and solely for dissemination and scientific, cultural, and non-commercial purposes.

  3. Authors may enter into further independent contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for instance, to include it in an institutional repository or personal webpage, or publish it in a book), provided it is not for commercial purposes and they clearly state that the work was first published in Frontera Norte (RFN) [and add the corresponding bibliographical record: Author/s (Year). Title of paper. Frontera Norte, volume (number), pp. doi: xxxx].

To that end, authors must submit the form assigning ownership of first publication rights, duly completed and signed. This document is to be uploaded in PDF format as a complementary file on the OJS platform.

Licencia de Creative Commons

This work is released under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)..

Author Biography

Dionicio MORALES RAMÍREZ, Facultad de Ingeniería "Arturo Narro Siller" de la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas

Doctor en Ciencias Sociales con orientación en desarrollo sustentable. Actualmente es profesor e investigador en la Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas y es Candidato al Sistema Nacional de Investigadores.

References

Boudet, H., Clarke, C., Bugden, D., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy, 65, 57-67. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017

Brown, R. B., Dorius, S. F., & Krannich, R. S. (2005). The Boom-Bust-Recovery cycle: Dynamics of Change in Community Satisfaction and Social Integration in Delta, Utah. Rural Sociology, 70(1), 28-49.

Centro de Investigaciones Sociales de la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas. (2015). Reporte de diagnóstico general social (p. 141). México: Centro de Investigaciones Sociales de la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas. Retrieved January 31, 2018, from http://www.impactosshalenoreste.uat.edu.mx/Docu-

ments/II.%20DIAGNÓSTICO-GENERAL-SOCIAL.pdf

Comisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos (CNH). (2015). Seguimiento a la exploración de aceite y gas de Lutitas. Mexico City: CNH. Retrieved July 19, 2017, from

http://cnh.gob.mx/informacion/docs/Exploraci%C3%B3n%20y%20extracci%C3%B3n%20de%20aceite%20y%20gas%20en%20lutitas.pdf

Choma, B., Hanoch, Y., & Currie, S. (2016). Attitudes toward hydraulic fracturing: The opposing forces of political conservatism and basic knowledge about fracking. Global Environmental Change, 38, 108-117.

Davidson, D. (1979). Overview of the boomtown phenomenon and its effect on women and minorities. In U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Energy Resource Development: Implications for Women and Minorities in the Intermountain West (pp. 15-25). Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2013). EIA/ARI World Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resource Assessment. Arlington, VA: EIA. Retrieved July 19, 2017, from https://www.adv-res.com/pdf/A_EIA_ARI_2013%20World%20Shale%20Gas%20and%20Shale%20Oil%20Resource%20Assessment.pdf

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (Inegi). (2015). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010. Mexico City: Inegi. Retrieved September 11, 2015, from http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/ccpv/cpv2010/default.aspx

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2014). Reporte de estadísticas. Retrieved May 11, 2015, from http://www.iea.org/stats/

Jacobsen, G., & Parker, D. (2014). The Economic Aftermath of Resource Booms: Evidence from Boomtowns in the American West. The Economic Journal,126(593), 1092-1128. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12173

Jacquet, J. (2009). Energy Boomtowns and Natural Gas: Implications for Marcellus Shale Local Governments and Rural Communities (Working Paper No. 43). University Park, PA: Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development, Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved May 1, 2015, from http://aese.psu.edu/nercrd/publications/rdp/rdp43

Jacquet, J. (2012). Landowner Attitudes toward Natural Gas and Wind Farm Development in Northern Pennsylvania. Energy Policy, 50, 677-688.

Kohrs, E. V. (1974). Social Consequences of Boom Growth in Wyoming. Paper presented at the Rocky Mountain American Association of the Advancement of Science Meeting in Laramie, Wyoming. Pindedale, WY: Sublette County. Retrieved from http://www.sublettewyo.com/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/97

Morales, D., & Roux, R. (2015). Estudio de impacto social: Antecedentes y líneas base para San Fernando, Tamaulipas. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 25(1), 111-130. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from http://revistasociotam.campuscemir.mx/ojssociotam/index.php/SOCIOTAM/article/view/424/405

Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex). (2016). Base de datos institucional de Pemex: Pemex-exploración y producción. Producción de gas natural por región y activo. Mexico City: Pemex. Retrieved December 21, 2016, from http://ebdi.pemex.com/bdi/bdi-Controller.do?action=cuadro&subAction=applyOptions

Secretaría de Energía (Sener). (2014). Prospectiva del gas natural y gas LP 2014-2028. Mexico City: Sener. Retrieved May 16, 2016, from https://www.gob.mx/

cms/uploads/attachment/file/352/Prospectiva-GasNaturalGasLP-2014.pdf

Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (Sedesol). (2013). Microrregiones: Cédulas de información municipal. Mexico City: Sedesol. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://www.microrregiones.gob.mx/zap/default.aspx?entra=nación

Schafft, K. A., Borlu, Y., & Glenna, L. (2013). The Relationship between Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Pennsylvania and Local Perceptions of Risk and Opportunity. Rural Sociology, 78(1), 143-166.

Statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) 19. New York, NY: IBM.

Theodori, G. (2012). Public Perception of the Natural Gas Industry: Data from the Barnett Shale. Energy Sources, Part B, 7(3), 275-281.

Theodori, G., & Jackson-Smith, D. (2010). Public Perception of the Oil and Gas Industry: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://www.shsu.edu/glt002/documents/spe134253-TheodoriandJackson-Smith.pdf

Whitmarsh, L., Nash, N., Upham, P., Lloyd, A., Verdon, J., & Kendall, M. (2015). UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support. Applied Energy, 160, 419-430.

Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., & Curtis, S. (2017). Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 89-104. doi:10.1177/0963662515595159

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.